SATS

Aims & Scope

SATS publishes accessible, high-quality academic articles in all traditions and fields of philosophy.

As a broad philosophy journal, it is our mission to promote philosophical dialogue across disciplinary boundaries, within philosophy and with neighboring fields.

To achieve this, articles submitted to SATS should be jargon-free and written in clear accessible prose address a broad audience of philosophers and philosophically oriented academics seek to contextualise the philosophical questions addressed Contemporary academic philosophy is characterised by increased specialisation and small technical and scholarly debates.

Although such discussions are crucial for the development and growth of knowledge, they require a counterbalance in the form of texts and contexts of broader scope.

We believe that original research in philosophy can be written in a non-technical, lucid style and that philosophical discussions have much to gain from such work.

To support a fruitful exchange of ideas, we encourage authors to explicate technical issues, and to clarify the relevance of their work to non-specialists.

View Aims & Scope

---

Metrics & Ranking

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

Year	Value
2024	0.139

Quartile

Year	Value
2024	Q3

h-index

Year	Value
2024	9

Journal Rank

Year	Value
2024	25409

Journal Citation Indicator

Year	Value
2024	21

---

Abstracting & Indexing

Journal is indexed in leading academic databases, ensuring global visibility and accessibility of our peer-reviewed research.

• Scopus
• Google Scholar

---

Subjects & Keywords

Journal’s research areas, covering key disciplines and specialized sub-topics in Arts and Humanities, designed to support cutting-edge academic discovery.

---

Most Cited Articles

The Most Cited Articles section features the journal's most impactful research, based on citation counts. These articles have been referenced frequently by other researchers, indicating their significant contribution to their respective fields.

• What kind of liberal is Martha Nussbaum?

  Citation: 14

  Authors: Linda

• Disoriented and Alone in the “Experience Machine” – On Netflix, Shared World Deceptions and the Consequences of Deepening Algorithmic Personalization

  Citation: 12

  Authors: Maria

• Political Liberalism and Respect: A Response to Linda Barclay

  Citation: 10

  Authors: Martha C.

• Embodiment and Expressivity in Husserl's Phenomenology: From Logical Investigations to Cartesian Meditations

  Citation: 9

  Authors: Sara

• Anthropocentrism versus Ecocentrism Revisited: Theoretical Confusions and Practical Conclusions

  Citation: 8

  Authors: Teea

• Limit-situation. Antinomies and Transcendence in Karl Jaspers' Philosophy

  Citation: 8

  Authors: Jonna

• Reason’s feeling: A systematic reconstruction of Kant’s theory of moral respect

  Citation: 7

  Authors: Jörg

• Normalizing Surveillance

  Citation: 6

  Authors: Evan, Hyo Joo (Judy)

• Back to the 3 R’s: Rights, Responsibilities and Reasoning

  Citation: 6

  Authors: Kenneth R.

• The norm of disinterestedness in science; a restorative analysis

  Citation: 6

  Authors: Stine, Klemens

---