Review of Managerial Science

Aims & Scope

Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration.

The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.).

The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation.

RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way.

Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome.

The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.

View Aims & Scope

---

Metrics & Ranking

Impact Factor

Year	Value
2025	9.6
2024	7.80

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

Year	Value
2024	2.316

Quartile

Year	Value
2024	Q1

h-index

Year	Value
2024	63

Journal Rank

Year	Value
2024	1094

Journal Citation Indicator

Year	Value
2024	3285

---

---

Abstracting & Indexing

Journal is indexed in leading academic databases, ensuring global visibility and accessibility of our peer-reviewed research.

• Scopus
• Google Scholar
• Web of Science

---

Subjects & Keywords

Journal’s research areas, covering key disciplines and specialized sub-topics in Business, Management and Accounting, designed to support cutting-edge academic discovery.

---

Most Cited Articles

The Most Cited Articles section features the journal's most impactful research, based on citation counts. These articles have been referenced frequently by other researchers, indicating their significant contribution to their respective fields.

• Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

  Citation: 685

  Authors: Sascha, Matthias, Weng Marc, Marina, Satish, Dominik, Debmalya, Vincenzo, Juan, Eric, Daniel, Francesco, Alberto, Cristina, João J.

• Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany

  Citation: 527

  Authors: Ramin, Klaus, Frank

• Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions

  Citation: 491

  Authors: Ricarda B., Johanna, Sascha, Marcel

• Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands

  Citation: 323

  Authors: Sascha, J. P. Coen, Mathew, Vincent

• How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal

  Citation: 316

  Authors: Oğuzhan, Rıdvan, Dominik K.

• Knowledge- and innovation-based business models for future growth: digitalized business models and portfolio considerations

  Citation: 275

  Authors: Ricarda B., Sascha, Norat

• Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship

  Citation: 274

  Authors: Ricarda B., Andreas J.

• Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends

  Citation: 260

  Authors: João J. M., Cristina I., Sascha

• Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field

  Citation: 253

  Authors: Paul

• How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions

  Citation: 231

  Authors: Philipp C., Stefan

---