Review of European Administrative Law

Aims & Scope

The Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw) is an international peer-reviewed journal, published four times a year, both online and in print.

The editing of REALaw is financed by the Department of Constitutional, Administrative Law and Public Administration of the University of Groningen.

The journal is managed by Annalisa Volpato, Maastricht University.

REALaw has an international editorial and advisory board.

View Aims & Scope

---

Metrics & Ranking

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

Year	Value
2024	0.184

Quartile

Year	Value
2024	Q3

h-index

Year	Value
2024	8

Journal Rank

Year	Value
2024	22226

Journal Citation Indicator

Year	Value
2024	29

---

Abstracting & Indexing

Journal is indexed in leading academic databases, ensuring global visibility and accessibility of our peer-reviewed research.

• Scopus
• Google Scholar

---

Subjects & Keywords

Journal’s research areas, covering key disciplines and specialized sub-topics in Social Sciences, designed to support cutting-edge academic discovery.

---

Most Cited Articles

The Most Cited Articles section features the journal's most impactful research, based on citation counts. These articles have been referenced frequently by other researchers, indicating their significant contribution to their respective fields.

• Competence Creep and General Principles of Law

  Citation: 16

  Authors: Sacha

• Dimensions of Transparency: The Building Blocks for a New Legal Principle?

  Citation: 12

  Authors: Sacha, Madeleine

• Judicial Review in an Integrated Administration: the Case of 'Composite Procedures'

  Citation: 9

  Authors: Mariolina

• Towards a European Administrative Procedure Act

  Citation: 9

  Authors: Anne, Ymre, Wim

• Redefining the Relationship between 'Rewe-effectiveness' and Effective Judicial Protection

  Citation: 8

  Authors: Sacha, Rob

• Right to be forgotten: european data imperialism, national privilege, or universal human right?

  Citation: 7

  Authors: Oskar J.

• The Past, Present and Future of the <i>Ne Bis In Idem</i> Dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights: The Cases of <i>Menci</i>, <i>Garlsson</i> and <i>Di Puma</i>

  Citation: 5

  Authors: Max

• Guidance documents of the European Commission: a typology to trace the effects in the national legal order

  Citation: 5

  Authors: Clara

• The '<i>Costanzo</i> Obligation' and the Principle of National Institutional Autonomy: Supervision as a Bridge to Close the Gap?

  Citation: 5

  Authors: Maartje

• In search of an EU approach to headscarf bans: where to go after<i> Achbita</i> and<i> Bougnaoui</i>?

  Citation: 5

  Authors: Titia

---