Common Market Law Review

Aims & Scope

For over 50 years, Common Market Law Review has provided the leading forum for exploring and debating the most important issues and developments in European Union Law.

The Editors welcome for review manuscripts that address topics drawn from across the entire and dynamic field of EU law, though we encourage authors to bear in mind the broad nature of our readership, as well as our goal to publish lasting contributions on the key questions facing our discipline.

It can be especially useful, when writing on an apparently more specialized area or subject, or when writing from a particular national perspective, to identify and / or explore its potential wider significance, its relationship with cognate issues in other fields, or its value as an exemplar of more general trends etc.

The Editors would also like to highlight the value of combining high standards of academic rigour in terms of research and critical analysis, with approaches that might enrich the perspectives also of our considerable readership working on policy and in practice at the national, European and international levels.

View Aims & Scope

---

Metrics & Ranking

Impact Factor

Year	Value
2025	2.1
2024	1.70

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

Year	Value
2024	1.211

Quartile

Year	Value
2024	Q1

h-index

Year	Value
2024	69

Journal Rank

Year	Value
2024	3504

Journal Citation Indicator

Year	Value
2024	445

---

---

Abstracting & Indexing

Journal is indexed in leading academic databases, ensuring global visibility and accessibility of our peer-reviewed research.

• Scopus
• Google Scholar
• Web of Science

---

Subjects & Keywords

Journal’s research areas, covering key disciplines and specialized sub-topics in Social Sciences, designed to support cutting-edge academic discovery.

---

Most Cited Articles

The Most Cited Articles section features the journal's most impactful research, based on citation counts. These articles have been referenced frequently by other researchers, indicating their significant contribution to their respective fields.

• The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces

  Citation: 178

  Authors: Deirdre M.

• Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law

  Citation: 146

  Authors: Philipp

• The Making of A Constitution For Europe

  Citation: 133

  Authors: G. Federico

• Subsidiarity: The wrong idea, in the wrong place, at the wrong time

  Citation: 86

  Authors: Gareth

• A tale of two courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European human rights <i>acquis</i>

  Citation: 84

  Authors: Sionaidh

• Civis capitalist sum: Class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights

  Citation: 84

  Authors: Charlotte

• Reverse Solange–Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States

  Citation: 82

  Authors: Armin, Maja, Matthias, Carlino, Johanna, Simon

• The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community

  Citation: 78

  Authors: Deborah Z.

• Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty

  Citation: 76

  Authors: Armin, Stephan W.

• The new EU “extraterritoriality”

  Citation: 70

  Authors: Joanne

---