Evaluation and the Health Professions

Aims & Scope

Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical protocols or tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions.

It is designed to provide a forum for keeping health professionals abreast of the latest technological advances in evaluation research methods as well as provide the results of important evaluations.

Furthermore, EHP is designed to provide a forum for debate of timely evaluation issues in health research and evaluation more broadly of importance to the health professions.

View Aims & Scope

---

Metrics & Ranking

Impact Factor

Year	Value
2025	1.6
2024	2.20

Journal Rank

Year	Value
2024	7299

Journal Citation Indicator

Year	Value
2024	309

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

Year	Value
2024	0.757

Quartile

Year	Value
2024	Q2

h-index

Year	Value
2024	64

---

---

Abstracting & Indexing

Journal is indexed in leading academic databases, ensuring global visibility and accessibility of our peer-reviewed research.

• Scopus
• Google Scholar
• Web of Science
• Medline

---

Subjects & Keywords

Journal’s research areas, covering key disciplines and specialized sub-topics in Medicine, designed to support cutting-edge academic discovery.

---

Most Cited Articles

The Most Cited Articles section features the journal's most impactful research, based on citation counts. These articles have been referenced frequently by other researchers, indicating their significant contribution to their respective fields.

• The Effects of Physician Empathy on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance

  Citation: 724

  Authors: Sung Soo, Stan, Mark V.

• Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research

  Citation: 697

  Authors: Lawrence W., Russell E.

• Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians

  Citation: 550

  Authors: Jonathan B., Timothy P., Verna L.

• A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires

  Citation: 526

  Authors: Sonya L., David, Benjamin J.

• To IPD or not to IPD?

  Citation: 446

  Authors: Lesley A., Jayne F.

• General Population and Cancer Patient Norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

  Citation: 429

  Authors: Penny S., Kathleen, John, Kimberly, David

• Prevalence of the Addictions: A Problem of the Majority or the Minority?

  Citation: 401

  Authors: Steve, Nadra, Mark

• Health Care Professionals as Second Victims after Adverse Events

  Citation: 401

  Authors: Deborah, Albert W., Eva Van, Arthur, Martin, Massimiliano, Susan D., James, Walter, Kris

• Enhancing Surveys of Health Care Professionals

  Citation: 398

  Authors: Young Ik, Timothy P., Jonathan B.

• Psychometric Evaluation and Normative Data for the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Nonclinical Sample of U.S. Adults

  Citation: 387

  Authors: Samuel Justin, Caleb J., Jenelle M., Michelle B., Megan, Mark A.

---